The use of sex dolls often sparks debate surrounding the issue of objectification. Critics argue that these dolls, designed to serve as sexual objects, reinforce harmful societal attitudes that devalue human beings by reducing them to mere objects for gratification. Such perspectives suggest that frequent engagement with dolls might diminish empathy, respect, and recognition of the autonomy of real individuals, potentially influencing attitudes toward partners and societal norms about relationships.

On the other hand, some posit that sex dolls can serve as a safe outlet for exploring sexuality, especially for individuals who face social, physical, or emotional barriers to forming traditional relationships. They argue that using sex dolls does not necessarily imply a lack of respect for others, and can be viewed as a personal choice that does not directly translate into harmful behaviors. Ethical perspectives also consider consent and the context of use—whether the doll is viewed as a tool for safe exploration or as an object of obsession. Ultimately, the debate hinges on whether sex dolls promote harmful objectification or serve as a form of individual expression without societal detriment. Responsible use, societal education, and ongoing ethical reflection are vital to navigating this complex issue, ensuring that personal choices do not inadvertently reinforce negative stereotypes or diminish human dignity.